This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; proposals are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued.
The Oklahoma City-Air Logistics Center (OC-ALC/PKEA) at Tinker Air Force Base Oklahoma, intends to negotiate a firm fixed price contract for the acquisition of material listed below. It is the government's intention to award sole source to Badger Meter Inc..
Proposal Submission Information:
Quotations are due by 3 December 2012, 10:00 am, Tinker AFB OK Central Standard Time (CST). Contact the following individual for information regarding this solicitation:
NOTE: Emailed proposals are preferred
Nycole Parker
Contract Specialist
[email protected]
EVALUATION OF RESPONSES:
Award will be conducted and evaluated under the provisions of FAR Part 12, Commercial Items. The responsible offeror must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database (available at: https://www.sam.gov/) system per FAR 52.212-3, and submit a completed copy of the Offeror Representations and Certifications - Commercial Items with their quote. Lack of registration in SAM will qualify contractor as ineligible for award. All responsible sources may submit a quotation in response to this solicitation, which shall be considered. This solicitation is being issued as a Request for Quotation (RFQ), for a firm fixed type contract. The Oklahoma City-Air Logistics Center (OC-ALC/PKEA) at Tinker Air Force Base Oklahoma intends to award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government (best value).
Rejection of Unrealistic Offers
The Government may reject any proposal/quote that is evaluated to be unrealistic in terms of program commitments, including contract terms and conditions, or unrealistically high or low in cost/price when compared to Government estimates, such that the proposal is deemed to reflect an inherent lack of competence or failure to comprehend the complexity and risks of the program.