TAPE CONNECTOR ASSY
The Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) line items
from this solicitation are not to be separately priced.
Offerors must factor into the end item unit price all
costs associated with the preparation and delivery of
the data deliverables in this contract.
Configuration Change Management - Engineering Change Proposal, Requests
for Variance (Deviation or Waiver) February 2015
1. Requirements
A. The Configuration Change Management section of SAE EIA-649-1
Configuration Management Requirement for Defense Contracts, Paragraph
3.3, shall be used for Configuration Control of material purchased under
this contract.
B. Furnished item(s) shall conform to the approved configuration
requirements/revision specified, unless a Pre-Production Request for
Variance (deviation) or a Post-Production Request for Variance (waiver),
is processed and approved as provided by Paragraph 3. in this Standard
Text Object (STO). Hereafter, the term #Request for Variance (RFV)#
will also include Requests for Deviations and Waivers.
2. The definitions from EIA-649-1 apply to items being procured under
this solicitation/contract, with the following clarification of
Deviation & Waiver:
A. Pre-Production RFV (previously known as deviation) requests
permission to produce a product that does not conform to contract
requirements/documentation for a limited amount of time and for
specified effectivity. (A deviation differs from an engineering change
in that an approved engineering change requires corresponding revision
of the item's current approved configuration documentation, whereas a
deviation does not.).
B. Post-Production RFV (previously known as waiver) requests
approval of product found during manufacture, or after having been
submitted for Government inspection or acceptance, that departs from
specified requirements, but nevertheless is considered suitable for use
"as is" or after repair by an approved method.
3. Contractor responsibilities.
A. An Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) is used to make permanent
changes in the Government technical data package (TDP). Pending
approval of an ECP, contractual relief should be requested in writing by
the Contractor using a RFV.
B. Refer to FAR Part 48 Value Engineering for cost saving
improvements to the Technical Data Package (TDP).
C. All ECPs submitted by the Contractor will be deemed routine.
If the Contractor considers an ECP as an emergency or urgent; they
shall include in their ECP submittal an explanation and all applicable
supporting documentation. All ECPs will be reviewed for a determination
on criticality, and, if concurred to be an emergency, the appropriate
processing time-frame negotiated with the ESAs will be followed and the
Contractor will be notified of anticipated response time.
D. For ECPs, Specification Change Notices (SCNs) or RFV, the
Contractor must submit the applicable documentation listed in
sub-paragraphs D.(1) through D.(4)to the Administrative Contracting
Officer(ACO), with an information copy to the Procuring Contracting
Officer (PCO). Failure to submit a complete legible package may result
in return of the ECP/RFV without processing.
(1) Documentation listed in Paragraph 3.3.1 (for ECPs), 3.3.2
(RFV), 3.3.3 (for SCNs) or 3.3.4 (for Notices of Revision (NORs)) of the
latest revision of EIA-649-1.
(2) DD Form 1692 (current revision) for ECP.
(3) DD Form 1694 (current revision) for RFV.
(4) DD Form 1695 (current revision) for NOR.
4. DLA#s responsibilities:
A. Upon receipt of the ECP or RFV, the PCO will ensure that the
applicable product specialist receives the copy from DCMA.
B. Within five (5) working days from the date of receipt of the
Contractor's ECP or RFV from DCMA, the PS must submit the requests and
any supporting documentation via a 339 to the appropriate Engineering
Support Activity (ESA), when applicable.
C. Routine ECPs will be processed within 90 days from receipt by
the ESA. RFVs will be evaluated and processed within 30 days from
receipt by the ESA or as negotiated with the ESA.
(1) The contractor will be notified in writing of approval by
the return of an approved copy of the ECP or RFV. Approval will be
reflected by signature of the contracting activity or a review activity
specifically identified in the contract.
(2) The contractor will be notified in writing of disapproval
including reason(s) for disapproval.
5. For an approved RFV or an approved ECP, when the request affects the
Contract, a modification will be issued to the contract incorporating
the applicable requirement changes. Only a Contracting Officer is
authorized to issue a modification incorporating the approved RFV and/or
ECP.
6. Questions regarding the status of previously submitted ECP or RFV
should be directed to the PCO.
7. The submission of an ECP or RFV by the Contractor does not affect
the required delivery date of the contract. If a delivery date change
is needed, it must be negotiated with the Contracting Officer and
documented via modification to the contract.
8. The period of time for evaluation and approval/disapproval of an ECP
and/or a RFV, as specified in Paragraph 4. C., shall not constitute
excusable delay in the performance of this Contract by the Contractor or
in any way relieve the contractor from compliance with the contract
delivery schedule. The submission of an ECP and/or RFV by the
Contractor shall not preclude the Government from exercising its rights
under any clause of the Contract. (End)
82N CSI
GOVERNMENT FIRST ARTICLE TESTING APPLIES
PRE-AWARD AND POST-AWARD SURVEY APPLIES
THE FOLLOWING DD FORM 1423 CDRL'S APPLY:
CDRL 14-12025AFAT
CDRL 14-12025APTI
CDRL 14 -12025ACOQC
THE FOLLOWING SUPPLEMENTAL QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS APPLY:
SQAP009903783QA
SQAP009903783FAT
AIRCRAFT LAUNCH AND RECOVERY EQUIPMENT (ALRE)
.
CRITICAL APPLICATION ITEM.
.
ALL REQUESTS FOR WAIVERS OR DEVIATIONS
CLASSIFIED AS CRITICAL, MAJOR, OR MINOR MUST BE
FORWARDED TO THE DSC CONTRACTING OFFICER FOR
REVIEW AND APPROVAL.
.
ALL ITEMS OF SUPPLY SHALL BE MARKED IAW
MIL-STD-129. IN ADDITION, EACH UNIT PACK WILL
BE MARKED WITH LOT AND SERIAL NUMBER (IF AVAILABLE),
CONTRACTOR'S CAGE CODE, ACTUAL MANUFACTURER'S
CAGE CODE AND PART NUMBER.
PCO MANDATORY INSPECTION. DURING PRODUCTION,
MANDATORY INSPECTION IS REQUIRED TO BE
ACCOMPLISHED AND DOCUMENTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AS
FOLLOWS:
.
CRITICAL AND MAJOR CHARACTERISTICS AS IDENTIFIED
IN CLASSIFICATION OF CHARACTERISTICS BLOCK ON
DRAWING(S), TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS, SECOND
TIER DOCUMENTS REFERENCED IN THE ACQUISITION
ITEM DESCRIPTION AND SPECIFIED IN THE
PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT, AND CHARACTERISTICS
DEFINED AS:
(A) MATERIAL CERTIFICATIONS
(B) DESTRUCTIVE AND / OR NONDESTRUCTIVE
TEST RESULTS (WHEN APPLICABLE)
(C) ATTRIBUTES FOR PLATING HARDNESS
.
IMPORTANT MINOR CHARACTERISTICS SHALL BE
DEFINED BY THE CONTRACTOR SUBJECT TO QAR
CONCURRENCE, UNLESS OTHERWISE DEFINED ON
APPLICABLE DRAWING(S), SPECIFICATIONS
AND CHARRACTERISTICS DEFINED AS:
(A) DIAMETRICAL AND LINEAR DIMENSIONS
HAVING A TOLERANCE OF +/- 0.005 INCH OR
LESS
(B) GEOMETRIC FEATURE CONTROLS HAVING A TOTAL
TOLERANCE OF 0.003 INCH OR LESS
(C) SURFACE FINISHES HAVING A 16 VALUE OR LESS
(D) CLASS THREE THREADS
(E) ANGULAR TOLERANCES WITH A TOTAL RANGE LESS
THAN 1 DEGREE
.
LEVEL OF INSPECTION: ANSI / ASQC Z1.4 FOR SINGLE
SAMPLING USING A GENERAL INSPECTION LEVEL O II
(A) CRITICAL AND MAJOR CHARACTERISTICS: 100%
INSPECTION APPLIES
(B) IMPORTANT MINOR CHARACTERISTICS: AQL OF 1.5
.
CERTIFICATION / DATA REPORTS: THE CONTRACTOR IS
RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARING A CERTIFICATE OF
QUALITY COMPLIANCE (COQC) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
DD FORM 1423 CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST
(CDRL). THE COQC CONTENT WILL INCLUDE AS A
MINIMUM THE DATA DESCRIBED IN DLAR CLAUSE
52.246-9000, IN ADDITION TO ALL PCO MANDATORY
INSPECTION RESULTS. THIS COQC REQUIREMENT
APPLIES TO EACH UNIT OF CONTRACT QUANTITY.
CLASS I OZONE DEPLETING CHEMICALS ARE NOT TO BE
USED NOR INCORPORATED IN ANY ITEMS TO BE
DELIVERED UNDER THIS CONTRACT.THIS PROHIBITION
SUPERSEDES ALL SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS BUT
DOES NOT ALLEVIATE ANY PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS.
SUBSTITUTE CHEMICALS MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR
APPROVAL UNLESS THEY ARE AUTHORIZED BY THE
SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.
52.246-11 Higher Level Contract Quality Requirement (Manufacturers)
FAR CLAUSE 52.246-11 APPLIES. A QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM MEETING THE
REQUIREMENTS OF ISO 9001:2008; A PROGRAM COMPARABLE TO ISO 9001:2008
(EXAMPLE SAE AS 9100), THE FOLLOWING TAILORED VERSION OF ISO 9001:2008;
OR A PROGRAM COMPARABLE TO THE TAILORED VERSION OF ISO 9001:2008
(EXAMPLE SAE AS 9003) IS REQUIRED. MIL-I-45208 AND MIL-Q-9858 ARE
OBSOLETE AND NO LONGER CONSIDERED SUITABLE WHEN HIGHER LEVEL QUALITY IS
REQUIRED. IN THE TAILORED VERSION OF THE ISO 9001:2008, ANY REFERENCES
WHICH CITE THE ENTIRE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ARE INTERPRETED AS
EXCLUSIONS TO THIS DOCUMENT.
DLA TAILORED HIGHER LEVEL QUALITY CLAUSE FROM ISO 9001:2008
4.1 General requirements, [excluding reference to 1.2 and excluding NOTE
3 c)]
4.2.1 General, [excluding subparagraph a)]
4.2.2 Quality manual, [excluding subparagraph a)]
4.2.3 Control of documents
4.2.4 Control of records
5.1 Management commitment
5.3 Quality policy
6.2.2 Competence, training and awareness
6.4 Work environment
7.1 Planning of product realization, [excluding NOTE 2]
7.2.1 Determination of requirements related to the product
7.2.2 Review of requirements related to the product
7.2.3 Customer communication
7.3.7 Control of design and development changes
7.4.1 Purchasing process
7.4.3 Verification of purchased product
7.5.1 Control of production and service provision
7.5.3 Identification and traceability
7.5.4 Customer property
7.5.5 Preservation of product
7.6 Control of monitoring and measuring equipment
8.1 General, [excluding subparagraph b) and subparagraph c)]
8.2.2 Internal audit
8.2.4 Monitoring and measurement of product
8.3 Control of nonconforming product
8.5.2 Corrective action
8.5.3 Preventive action
REMINDER: THIS IS A CRITICAL ITEM AND ALL
MAJOR AND MINOR WAIVER/DEVIATION REQUESTS MUST
BE FORWARDED TO THE DSCC CONTRACTING OFFICER WHO
WILL COORDINATE THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL THROUGH
THE RESPONSIBLE ENGINEERING SERVICE ACTIVITY.
NOTE: THIS IS A RESTRICTED SOURCE ITEM AND
REQUIRES ENGINEERING SOURCE APPROVAL BY THE
GOVERNMENT DESIGN CONTROL ACTIVITY.
"CERTIFICATE OF QUALITY COMPLIANCE IS MANDATORY"
THIS MATERIAL MUST MEET NAVAIR AIRCRAFT LAUNCH &
RECOVERY EQUIPMENT TRACEABILITY REQUIREMENTS. BARE
ITEM MARKINGS SHALL BE IAW THE TECHNICAL DATA
DRAWINGS PROVIDED.
BARE ITEM MATERIAL SHALL BE MARKED WITH CONTRACT
NUMBER, NAWC CAGE, AND PART NUMBER UNLESS OTHERWISE
SPECIFICIED ON ASSOCIATED DRAWING. IF A CONFLICT
EXISTS WITH MARKING REQUIREMENTS OF THIS 82N ALRE/SE
ITEM, THE ASSOCIATED DRAWING REQUIREMENTS SHALL APPLY.
SURPLUS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR THIS NSN. (ALRE CSI/CAI)
CRITICAL APPLICATION ITEM
CAPY MACHINE SHOP INC. DBA 0BVP9 P/N 510445-1
MICRO STEEL INC. DBA 0T9A2 P/N 510445-1
WELLMAN DYNAMICS MACHINING AND 6JRD9 P/N 510445-1
IAW REFERENCE DRAWING NR 80020 MPR1212
REVISION NR R DTD 10/19/1990
PART PIECE NUMBER:
IAW REFERENCE DRAWING NR 80020 MPR1221
REVISION NR R DTD 10/01/2001
PART PIECE NUMBER:
IAW REFERENCE DRAWING NR 80020 416074
REVISION NR L DTD 02/24/2012
PART PIECE NUMBER:
IAW REFERENCE QAP 16236 SQAP009903783QA
REVISION NR DTD 03/12/2014
PART PIECE NUMBER:
IAW REFERENCE QAP 16236 SQAP009903783
REVISION NR DTD 03/12/2014
PART PIECE NUMBER:
IAW REFERENCE QAP 16236 CDRL-14-12025FAT
REVISION NR DTD 01/27/2014
PART PIECE NUMBER:
IAW REFERENCE QAP 16236 CDRL-14-12025PTI
REVISION NR DTD 01/27/2014
PART PIECE NUMBER:
IAW REFERENCE QAP 16236 CDRL-14-12025COQC
REVISION NR DTD 01/27/2014
PART PIECE NUMBER:
IAW REFERENCE DRAWING NR 16236 CN009903783
REVISION NR DTD 03/12/2014
PART PIECE NUMBER:
IAW REFERENCE DRAWING NR 80020 510445
REVISION NR G DTD 02/22/2012
PART PIECE NUMBER: 510445-1
IAW REFERENCE DRAWING NR 80020 510465
REVISION NR J DTD 09/16/2010
PART PIECE NUMBER:
IAW REFERENCE DRAWING NR 80020 510466
REVISION NR D DTD 06/28/2010
PART PIECE NUMBER:
IAW REFERENCE DRAWING NR 80020 MPR1233
REVISION NR A DTD 03/19/1990
PART PIECE NUMBER: